Quick Answer: Israel enforces qualifying foreign judgments under the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law 1958 — without re-litigating the merits. Qualifying countries include the UK, Germany, France, Austria, and others. The application is made to the District Court. Once declared enforceable, the judgment can be collected through the Execution Office.

1. Overview

If you have obtained a court judgment against an Israeli party (or a foreign party with assets in Israel) from a court outside Israel, you do not necessarily need to start fresh litigation in Israel to collect. Under the right circumstances, Israel will recognise and enforce the foreign judgment — treating it as equivalent to an Israeli judgment for enforcement purposes.

This mechanism — known as "recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments" — is governed by the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law 1958 (Chok Afikudat Psakei Din Zarim). Understanding which judgments qualify, what the process involves, and what can go wrong is essential for any foreign creditor with an Israeli recovery target.

2. The Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law 1958

The 1958 law creates a simplified procedure for declaring certain foreign judgments enforceable in Israel. The critical feature of this procedure is that the Israeli court does not re-examine the merits of the foreign judgment — it does not retry the case or reassess the evidence. It only verifies that the procedural and jurisdictional prerequisites are met.

Once declared enforceable by the Israeli District Court, the foreign judgment becomes equivalent to an Israeli judgment and can be enforced through the Execution Office (Lishkat HaHotzaa LaPoal) in exactly the same way as a domestic judgment — with all the tools available: bank levies, wage garnishment, property seizure, travel bans, and licence suspensions.

3. Qualifying Countries ("Reciprocating States")

The simplified enforcement procedure applies only to judgments from countries designated as reciprocating states by Israeli regulation — countries that give equivalent enforcement to Israeli judgments on a reciprocal basis. The list currently includes:

  • United Kingdom
  • Germany
  • France
  • Austria
  • Italy
  • Belgium
  • Netherlands
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Spain
  • Certain other countries — the list is updated periodically by regulation

Notably, the United States is not currently on the list of reciprocating states. This is because the US does not have a uniform federal enforcement-of-foreign-judgments mechanism — it is a state-by-state matter, and Israel has not designated US judgments as qualifying under the 1958 law. However, US judgments can still be enforced in Israel through alternative routes (see section 7).

4. Requirements for Enforcement

To qualify for enforcement under the 1958 law, a foreign judgment must meet all of the following requirements:

  • It is a money judgment: The 1958 law applies to money judgments. Non-monetary relief (injunctions, declarations, specific performance) is handled differently.
  • It is final and conclusive: The judgment must be a final decision of the foreign court — not an interim or interlocutory order. A judgment under appeal may still be enforced if the appeal does not have automatic suspensive effect.
  • It was given by a court of competent jurisdiction: The foreign court must have had proper jurisdiction over the defendant under principles that Israeli law recognises as legitimate.
  • The defendant was properly served: The defendant must have been given proper notice of the foreign proceedings and an opportunity to be heard.
  • It is not contrary to Israeli public policy: Enforcement must not be contrary to Israeli public policy or morality.
  • It has not been satisfied: The judgment must not already have been paid or otherwise extinguished.

5. Grounds for Refusing Enforcement

Even for qualifying foreign judgments, the Israeli court can refuse to enforce in the following circumstances:

  • Fraud: The judgment was obtained by fraud — including fraud on the foreign court (perjury, fabricated evidence) or fraud by the creditor.
  • Natural justice: The defendant was not given a fair opportunity to be heard in the foreign proceedings (e.g., inadequate notice, denial of representation).
  • Conflicting judgments: There is a conflicting judgment from another court on the same matter — e.g., an Israeli court has already given judgment on the same issue.
  • Public policy: Enforcement would be manifestly contrary to Israeli public policy. This is a narrow exception — Israeli courts are reluctant to use it and only apply it in exceptional cases (e.g., judgments arising from fundamentally unjust foreign proceedings).
  • Israeli exclusive jurisdiction: The subject matter of the judgment is within the exclusive jurisdiction of Israeli courts (e.g., title to Israeli land).

The burden of proving any of these grounds rests on the debtor opposing enforcement.

6. The Application Process

The application to enforce a foreign judgment is made to the Israeli District Court. The process:

  1. File a petition: The creditor (through an Israeli attorney) files a petition to the District Court, attaching a certified copy of the foreign judgment, a translation into Hebrew, and supporting evidence.
  2. Service on the debtor: The debtor is served with the petition and has the right to file opposition within a set period.
  3. Court hearing: The court reviews the petition — and any opposition — and decides whether the requirements for enforcement are met. In uncontested cases, this can be a paper hearing. Contested cases require argument.
  4. Declaration of enforceability: If satisfied, the court issues an order declaring the foreign judgment enforceable in Israel. This order is then treated as an Israeli judgment for all enforcement purposes.
  5. Execution Office: The creditor opens an Execution Office file using the District Court's enforcement declaration as the basis.

In uncontested cases, the process from filing to declaration typically takes 2–4 months. Contested cases take longer — the debtor may raise substantive objections that require full argument.

7. Judgments from Non-Qualifying Countries (Including the US)

For judgments from countries not on the reciprocating states list — including the United States — the simplified 1958 law procedure does not apply. However, there are alternative routes:

Common law enforcement: Under Israeli common law principles (based on English law tradition), a foreign judgment from any country can be used as the basis for a fresh civil claim in Israel — a claim on the judgment. The foreign judgment creates a presumption of debt that shifts the burden to the debtor to disprove. While it involves filing a new claim, in practice an uncontested case can be resolved relatively quickly with a default judgment.

Res judicata / issue estoppel: Where the same issues have already been litigated and decided in the foreign court, Israeli courts will generally give preclusive effect to those findings, even without the formal 1958 law mechanism.

For US creditors specifically, engaging an Israeli attorney early to assess the best enforcement route is important — the path to enforcement is achievable but requires more procedural steps than for reciprocating-state creditors.

8. Foreign Arbitral Awards

Foreign arbitral awards are governed by a different — and in some respects simpler — regime. Israel is a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958, which provides for straightforward enforcement of arbitral awards between contracting states.

Under the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards must be enforced unless narrow exceptions apply (similar to those for foreign judgments). The application is made to the District Court. This is often a faster and more reliable path to enforcement than court judgments for creditors who had the foresight to include an arbitration clause in their commercial agreements with Israeli parties.

Advertisement